Re-read excerpts from the judgment on the Olga Telis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation case.

0 votes
12 views
asked Jan 20, 2018 in Civics by Ankit Agarwal (28,847 points) 7 31 67

Re-read excerpts from the judgment on the Olga Telis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation case. Now write in your own words what the judges meant when they said that the Right to Livelihood was a part of the Right to Life.

1 Answer

0 votes
answered Jan 20, 2018 by Ankit Agarwal (28,847 points) 7 31 67
 
Best answer

Right to Life has a very wide meaning. Life for human beings does not mean an animal existence because human beings cannot live like animals. Human beings need to live a life of dignity. A human being also needs some source of livelihood to sustain the family and to live a comfortable life. Any act which disrupts the livelihood of a person is the violation of Right to Life.

Welcome to Sarthaks eConnect: A unique platform where students can interact with teachers/experts/students to get solutions to their queries. Students (upto class 10+2) preparing for All Government Exams, CBSE Board Exam, ICSE Board Exam, State Board Exam, JEE (Mains+Advance) and NEET can ask questions from any subject and get quick answers by subject teachers/ experts/mentors/students.

One Thought Forever

“There is a close connection between getting up in the world and getting up in the morning.“
– Anon
~~~*****~~~

...